Beyond the Block: The Language of Fighting
by Corey Padnos
“Use you’re words, not your
fists.” -Your misinformed
elementary school teachers on the playground.
“Make sure it’s an honest
punch.”-Martin Wheeler
Months ago, an honest punch
seemed like an analogy for “give em’ a good one” so that you can practice for a
more real world application for fighting.
That’s only part of the
equation.
As humans as a whole, we
communicate both verbally and physically.
In our daily jobs we’re oftentimes only stuck with the verbal side of
things. Some even troll on the
Internet with ever-devolving and harsh language because there isn’t a physical
outlet. (In my opinion, some
physical altercations—as brutal as it can be—are more honest that some
anonymous jerk blogging with vulgarity against somebody on a web forum.) There is a physical communication that
needs to take place. Martial Art
or any sort of physical training with intent helps educate how to place
yourself physically near somebody and to be comfortable. In a way, when you
train your physicality, you train your comfort level on intimacy. I want to make a distinction: Not sexual intimacy, but physical
intimacy. Every punch you throw,
every time you wrap your forearms around an opponent’s neck, every time you dig
your feet into somebody’s knee caps—you are trying to use physical contact to
elicit a reaction to better understand who they are and how they understand
touch. The entire premise of a
fight is that it is—at its core—a conversation. I strive to understand this statement every time I train
Systema.
Author’s note: I think fighting is a less than optimal
form of communication. Please
don’t judge me for not yet understanding it. This lack of knowledge on my part is why I train martial
art—the language of fighting—in order to better communicate with others who
speak it so well.
What I learned was that I
need to understand somebody’s physical motives better. When I’m attacked, I need to go beyond
the block psychology. A block is a shield that stops momentum. This is one reason why Systema
emphasizes flow and constant movement instead of countering force with more force. If I were having a conversation with
you—verbal or physical—why would I want to put my arms up and stop it?
Having flow and constant
movement requires compassion for your opponent. When he or she starts a fight,
you have to let them attack you and use your movements to let them speak their
piece. Once you understand the
heart of the issue—their tension, structural faults, missteps, etc.—only then can
you effectively communicate with your body. Only finally when your opponent yields onto the ground, he
or she understand your point of view.
I write this article as a
promise, to you, my training partners or future training partners, that I look
forward to starting a dialogue and striving to be honest with you. My intent now is give my practice
partners and opponents fully committed attacks so that we both can learn how to
better communicate. I strive
for: No more stopping half way
through a strike, performing speeds that don’t match my partner, or even being
afraid during training so that my strikes have anger.
Thank you for reading my
words. I look forward to “having a
chat.”
Thanks for starting this conversation Corey. I apologize as I don't think I fully understand everything you are trying to communicate with this post but it did evoke some feelings and ideas so I'm going to see if we can't flow and keep this idea rolling...
ReplyDelete“Use you’re words, not your fists.” -Your misinformed elementary school teachers on the playground...
My initial response after reading this was it left me feeling a little pissed off. When I am on yard duty we have maybe 10 teachers supervising over 350 students. We are out numbered. There is no way we can control and monitor that many "physical" conversations at a time. As it is at my school I've had a 10 year old bring a switch blade to school, and an 8 year old bring a switch blade that he actually attempted to use on another student. I will at least concede that trying to stop physical interactions altogether may not be the most effective solution, but at the present time I don't have a more effective one that wouldn't cost $ that school boards just don't have.
My MovNat practice has taught me about mindfulness and movement efficiency in many different contexts and has made me question the current physical education practices and how much they could use a major overall. In an idealistic world it would be great to see children being taught not just to use their words, but also to use their bodies as well when interacting and resolving conflicts.
Teaching in an inner city school has shown me how primal and instinctual our physical nature is and I can see how much it has been suppressed in higher socioeconomic areas. I would love to understand the physical motives of my students better than I do now.
I have super fond memories of epic wrestling battles with my older brothers and watching battles between my brothers and his best friends. Growing up it was a way in which we relieved stress and conflict with each other. No one was ever intentionally hurt, but bruises, muscle fatigue and soreness, cuts, scraps were often a result, just as they would be when training other sports and activities. Respect was paid to winner and we moved on.
We are kindred spirits Corey. I love your honest intentions and look forward to following your progress and learning more from you and with you :)
Chuala Bear
My intent was definitely not to piss you off! I'm sorry! I meant "your misinformed teachers" tongue and cheek but upon re-reading, I can see how that could strike a nerve. For that, I humbly plead ignorance and state my respect for the teaching profession. (I am one, after all.) As I state above, I don't condone violence. But I try to understand it.
DeleteWhat you do, Cynthia, is amazing by fighting everyday. By keeping a dialogue--to set a physical and verbal example for children. Keep it up.
Haha, don't apologize Bear Chu!!! I know that wasn't your intention - you don't have any ill will in you at all! I think it's awesome that you wrote something that evoked an emotional response from me!!!! Plus, that was only my initial response, the important stuff comes after where I thought I absorbed more of what you were saying when I talk about over hauling physical education so that perhaps what we should be doing instead of telling kids to "keep their hands and feet to themselves", perhaps we should be teaching them how to use them safely, and efficiently....I don't really know, but I like that you're talking about it :)
ReplyDeleteBtw... I read your training for Zen philosophy on the side panel of your blog and I am even more convinced we are related, and am still completely thrilled at the fact we are both bears! What a random beautiful thing! :)